Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilruba Yasmeen Ruhee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 17:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dilruba Yasmeen Ruhee[edit]

Dilruba Yasmeen Ruhee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails GNG. References are not significant. Most of the sources are WP:INTERVIEW and rests are eco of two news. (Got married and entered into film industry). Arr4 (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 14:58, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning keep The trouble with journalism of this nature is that it is frequently VERY gushing and fawning in a way that we would not accept in Western media. My feeling is that this actress is probably notable, especially as she was chosen as the face of London's Bengali film festival and some of the interviews are in high quality reputable sources such as The Daily Star (Bangladesh). Some of the interviews also have editorial commentary such as this source beyond the interview itself. She already has a quite impressive filmography and the article appears appropriate in tone and more or less neutral. If this article is deleted, it would be on the technicality that a clearly successful, highly respected (as in chosen to host a London film festival and represent her country's film industry) actress has not received the right sort of coverage. Mabalu (talk) 11:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep Has starred in movies, TV drama multiple coverage in independent sources from both India and Bangladesh. She has notability.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 10:16, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 10:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.