Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dillon Danis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:23, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dillon Danis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet nobility standards. WP:MMABIO suggests 3 top tier fights, which this doesn't have, in fact only one fight at all. Notability is low at this point. TBMNY (talk) 17:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator.PRehse (talk) 07:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I used to IBJJF website to correct the results given at BJJ Heroes and originally used in the article. He has never won a medal as a black belt at any IBJJF world championship. As best I can find he has 2 wins and 3 losses at those events while having 1 win and 3 losses at the ADCC. I don't believe anything here is sufficient to meet WP:MANOTE. I focused on his BJJ records because it's clear he doesn't meet WP:NMMA with only 1 fight (and that wasn't a top tier one) and I don't see the coverage as sufficient to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 02:06, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Papaursa. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.