Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dil Shova Shrestha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. The Bushranger One ping only 09:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dil Shova Shrestha[edit]

Dil Shova Shrestha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am concerned that the subject does not meet the criteria for inclusion. There is certainly zero evidence of notability provided by the article itself (but that doesn't mean it should be deleted) but on researching through the sources it relates to a lady in Nepal who has opened her home to about 85 less fortunate people in an act of admirable charity. She received some notoriety being interviewed on television at one point. The first link is a deadlink for me, the second is a blog written about the aforementioned tv interview, and the third is a news article on the television show. I myself am on the fence with this one, wondering if it will scrape through GNG, but I wanted to have it decided by the community. I'll message the creator on this point, because I don't want to appear bitey. S.G.(GH) ping! 13:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have added more references to the article which may prove this is notable article. And the first link is working too. So, this article should not be deleted. Thanks. Ashishlohorung (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:20, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete At the very best she is notable for one event. She is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.