Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dijon Talton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dijon Talton[edit]
- Dijon Talton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not Notable. note prod was removed by an IP address JDDJS (talk) 00:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep None of the Above. The decision to delete an LA actor smells bad when the subject page in question contains a beg for money message from Jimbo Wales. There is clearly way too much East Coast user/admin bias on these deletions. Anyone named after a mustard brand has to be worthy of notable citations and Glee is not a web based junk factory. Actors and artistic performers should not be deleted by armchair critics who have no personal knowledge or have actually seen them perform. Rather than deletionism why not try to improve the content or reach out to the contributors by obtaining more information? Thats what REAL journalists would do. PsychClone (talk) 22:59, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Ignore troll's comment. JDDJS (talk) 21:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't know what is going on with the discussion above. Ignoring that, it seems to me that this individual clearly does not meet WP:NACTOR. Bondegezou (talk) 16:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete very short career[1] indicates this article is WP:TOOSOON. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.