Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digvijay Suryavanshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Digvijay Suryavanshi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a mayor that does not meet WP:NPOL and has no other indication of notability. Mccapra (talk) 08:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 08:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sangli is certainly large enough that a substantive and well referenced article about its mayor could be kept, but the notability of a mayor is established by writing and sourcing substantive content about his political impact, not just by offering technical verification of his election victory in and of itself. But the latter is all this is: following one sentence stating that he exists as a mayor, the rest of the content is just bulletpointing his electoral history without offering one word about anything he did in the job. Bearcat (talk) 01:38, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the golden wisdom by Bearcat. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can smile at the word delete in your comment 😂😂😂😂... The best example of this is the Wikipedia page 👉https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kishori_Pednekar Nomadicghumakkad Bearcat

Please read WP:WAX. Sangli is not even remotely equivalent in international importance to Mumbai, so just because you can find a mayor of Mumbai with a bad, virtually worthless article that desperately needs improvement doesn't mean a mayor of Sangli automatically gets to keep an article modelled on it — Kishori Pednekar also needs to be either improved or deleted, and is not the baseline standard for making a keepable article about a mayor. If you want to see the kind of article a mayor is supposed to have, look at someone like John Tory, Bill de Blasio or Sadiq Khan — you don't get to look for the worst article about another mayor you can find and say that yours has to be kept because it isn't any worse than that, you have to try to make this article the best article possible by modelling it on our best articles about other mayors. Bearcat (talk) 13:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In Maharashtra, most of the news is in local Marathi newspapers However, you can't read Marathi, so this is the main problem To review such Wikipedia pages, you should ask senior Wikipedia Marathi people in Maharashtra to do the same

Everything else you said is true

Bearcat

There is another Wikipedia page 😂😂 👉https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murlidhar_Mohol. The source of the news article in this page is only the mayor who has been elected and no other source of news paper. Bearcat

Right now I had given you an example. so let me reply about that example... Did not get the answer then I will understand that you people discriminate with many people Bearcat

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.