Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digvijay Chautala

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Digvijay Chautala[edit]

Digvijay Chautala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. From the references given it is not proven that he was ever elected as MLA. This reference does not list him as MLA but Abhay Chautala as the MLA. This reference has nothing in it and this reference is from Haryana Vidhan Sabha and belongs to a different person (MLA) called Ajay Singh Chautala. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 13:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:48, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Digvijay Chautala is son of Ajay Chautala and now he is MP.Pjlpalt (talk) 17:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep He is son of Ajay Chautala and leader of student organisation at National level.117.224.227.3 (talk) 08:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Being a son of someone notable does not make another person notable. Neither does being a leader of student organization make a politician notable. I also suspect that IP 117.224.227.3 is a SOCK of Pjlpalt since this vote is the first and only edit made by the IP. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 10:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's particularly still nothing convincing for his own notability, the Keep votes are not convincing. SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.