Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digon (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 10:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Digon (disambiguation)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no other Wikipedia articles about subjects simply called "Digon". There are mostly partial title matches on this disambiguation page, which was previously deprodded by Boleyn with this edit. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is irrelevant whether there are other articles, but whether there are other valid entries, perhaps per MOS:DABMENTION. In this case, there are no partial matches (unless the valley could never be called simply 'Digon' and then that would be a partial match). This is a dab and surname page is one, and is structured appropriately as such per MOS:DABNAME: For short lists of name holders, new sections of Persons with the surname Xxxx or Persons with the given name Xxxx can be added below the main disambiguation list. It has a sufficient number of entries. Boleyn (talk) 06:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: valid and helpful dab page. PamD 12:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:17, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let digons be digons. There are more than enough entries for a dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.