Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Yeah, I see it's a copyvio, but the debate here is obvious enough, and it shows no sign of gettng permission during the CV process. -Splashtalk 23:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I proposed moving this article to Wikibooks on January 8. No feedback since then, so I moved it there. It's original research and not appropriate for Wikipedia. Tim Pierce 05:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-20 07:32Z
- Delete per Quarl -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 16:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. I tagged this with a db-copyvio speedy and blanked the content, since it is copied from a commercial content provider that is selling the material online for $26.28 plus tax. That sort of thing needs to be dealt with quickly. MCB 02:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, the speedy did not stick due to the 48-hour rule, so I listed it for non-speedy copyvio. MCB 02:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I didn't list it as a copyvio in the first place because the original poster of the material appears to be the author. Tim Pierce 04:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, the speedy did not stick due to the 48-hour rule, so I listed it for non-speedy copyvio. MCB 02:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.