Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital anomie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein, relative to Wikipedia policies, is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:16, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Digital anomie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEO with only a single Spanish source of unclear authority describing a questionnaire that asked students about "anomia digital" (autotranslating as "Digital anomie is a concept created by the research group FISHERNET Educational Technology").

Beyond that it's all WP:SYNTHESIS; one academic wrote about "being digital" in 1995, another about "anomie" in 1897. McGeddon (talk) 08:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:NEO. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOR --НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 14:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Digital anomie is a concept created by the research group FISHERNET Educational Technology. Their main objective is to describe a new situation about how minors who are using internet services without follow the rules. This new situation requires a new concept "digital + anomie". That not means that any other authors such as Negroponte had used this term beforehand.Jaltuna (talk) 22:27, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above (WP:NEO/WP:NOR). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.