Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digimon Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Digimon Online[edit]

Advertisement, copyright violation dealing with Digimon World 3. KL 00:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete - The key item here is that this is an IDEA for a game. There's no game. There's no notable people working on it. There's no information about how much is done or when it will be released. Indeed, the only reference I can find to this person's previous work is a failed project. This just isn't encyclopedic. -Harmil 02:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if you look at the history, the only author of this page tried twice to blank his own page (and both times the page blanking was autoreverted by a bot). Is this evidence that the author wants the page to be deleted? Either way, there is no way to WP:CITE and pretty much all of the text could be removed by WP:V. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 04:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete as per above. --BrownHairedGirl 07:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 09:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per above. No such game, article is ultimately meaningless. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 09:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, wishful thinking and not much more -- Ned Scott 11:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. --Larry V (talk | contribs) 14:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Themindset 17:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Ryūlóng 04:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unverifiable, the game doesn't exist, and Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Peephole 15:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)--[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 21:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A idea for a fan-made game wouldn't seem to cut it. Shining Celebi 17:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.