Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digabit
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Digabit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor company that won a very very minor award (so not quite an A7). All sources are, or are based on, press releases, nothing independent or substantial at all. Guy (Help!) 11:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 12:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 12:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 12:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 12:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. (If I referenced-checked that article, almost every ref would end up with a tag after it.) - David Gerard (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as entirely PR for a newly started company, nothing at all substantial. SwisterTwister talk 22:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- TOOSOON; the company is not yet notable. Coverage is PR / trivial and insufficient to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.