Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dieu que le monde est injuste

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Notre-Dame de Paris (musical)#Musical numbers. Sandstein 09:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dieu que le monde est injuste[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NSONGS, "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject[1] of multiple,[2] non-trivial[3] published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." I actually can't find any such sources, so I conclude that the song is not notable. (t · c) buidhe 00:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 00:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. (t · c) buidhe 00:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google mostly returns listings of lyrics or music videos for the song. I can't find much saying it charted, or anything about it otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 22:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: could this be redirected to Notre-Dame de Paris (musical)#Musical numbers per WP:CHEAP (it's number 45 on that list)? Richard3120 (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Notre-Dame de Paris (musical)#Musical numbers: Barely found anything about the song. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.