Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Lucio Rapoport
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 18:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Diego Lucio Rapoport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject exists ([1]), but no in depth coverage from independent reliable sources or indication of substantial impact within or without of the field. WP:PROF and WP:GNG seem the most appropriate guidelines.
Searches performed: Google, Ask, GScholar, GNews (just in case), and Web of Science - 2/0 (cont.) 15:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Web of Science cites of 10, 9, 9, 8, 5… fail to meet WP:ACADEMIC point 1 and no sign he meets any of the other criteria or WP:BIO#Basic criteria. Note that the Telesio - Galilei Academy of Science Advisory Board the Alpha Institute of Advanced Study are both associated with Myron W. Evans of Einstein–Cartan–Evans theory, so membership or higher roles in these don't count towards criterion 3 of WP:ACADEMIC. --Qwfp (talk) 12:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not make WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.