Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Die Männer der Emden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Die Männer der Emden[edit]

Die Männer der Emden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews found in a BEFORE.

PROD removed with no improvement DonaldD23 talk to me 04:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Military, and Germany. DonaldD23 talk to me 04:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. The German article references several, as it says, "miserable reviews", including full-length reviews from four major German newspapers. I'm not sure there's much to say about it in English other than who was in it and that it wasn't very good, though. Adam Sampson (talk) 16:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A film is a film. If we limited film articles to those that won awards, howwever prestigious, however weak, we wouldn't have that many films in. A German film about a true World War I story and the adventures of its crew would have strong international historical interest.Foofbun (talk) 05:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Meets GNG, coverage in major German news publications.--Milowenthasspoken 13:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per the four German newspaper reviews of the film so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.