Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Palm
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. One two three... 20:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dick Palm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A TV news report in the small market of Presque Isle, Maine. Has been a TV reporter for seven years. No reliable sources outside of the TV station to be found. PROD was contested. Another reporter from the same station currently has an AfD ongoing. Bgwhite (talk) 21:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bgwhite (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jayron32 19:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-Googled this and nothing reliable came up. not on google news or on reliable websites. sophomoric prank.Carlosiru smith (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability. --Cox wasan (talk) 22:49, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lack of notability, fails wp:GNG for lack of coverage in reliable publications not directly related to the topic. Chris (talk) 23:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable reporter for a local news station. Local news reporters are almost never notable. --Madison-chan (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can find no news coverage of the subject but as he's a reporter, this is very common. If this were a larger market, I may be inclined to reassess my !vote but I can't see how even an WP:IAR argument can be made for a Keep. I really wish there was a better way to assess the notability of reporters and news sources themselves. OlYeller21Talktome 15:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.