Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Justice (Max Payne)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne. --bainer (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Justice (Max Payne)

Delete or Merge Is just plain not notable enough for its own article; perhaps needs to be cover in the main Max Payne 2 article, but not here. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 01:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no content worth merging. No reference to any sort of real world significance. --Daniel J. Leivick 01:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 05:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and possibly include some sort of reference in the main article. Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 05:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If you know or want to know about Max Payne, it is notable. Keep. Dfrg.msc 06:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, by that logic an article about me would be acceptable because my friends know and/or want to know about me. Oh wait, I have no friends.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 06:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to say almost the exact thing the person above this said; "wanting to know about Max Payne" does not merit this article's creation. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 16:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone's perseption of notability does not merit the deletion of the article. Dfrg.msc 03:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a matter of perception, it is a matter of fact, there are notability criteria laid out in WP:NOTE. --Daniel J. Leivick 23:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge into a condensed summary in the characters section of Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne. — brighterorange (talk) 13:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, lacks multiple sources which are independent and verifiable. Edison 16:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
merge per Brighterorange DUBJAY04 16:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This and all other fictional TV shows in Max Payne. Articles like Lords and Ladies (Max Payne) are in-universe jokes with no relevance to the outside world. - hahnch e n 17:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, doesn't meet standards... - Denny 00:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an entertainment magazine. NetOracle 01:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per Brighterorange --Esun 01:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, is a running theme throughout the series and quite unlike anything else I've seen in any other game. Mathmo ^Talk 06:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, at best Chainsaw Merge to Max Payne 2: The Fall of Max Payne (along with Lords and Ladies and Address Unknown, though those also appear in MP1, but there's not really a lot to be said about them that you could cover in an encyclopaedia...) a notable running gag in the game, but sure as heck not notable as an article of its own! If it were repeated in Max Payne III, IV and V, maybe then, but since it's (as of yet) in only one game... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The first part, per Bright Orange & Wwwolf, into the character section of Max Payne 2, then redirect. QuagmireDog 11:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Brighterorange -- S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 19:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.