Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Bros Record Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fish (singer). There's a preference stated for delete and redirect, but I don't see any valid arguments to support that. We generally only delete the history in cases of copyvio, BLP problems, etc. Simple lack of WP:N isn't a good reason. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Bros Record Company[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record company that does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH, as per source searches. Could be redirected to Fish (singer). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:26, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:26, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:26, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fish (singer). This one's a little tough, because it's mostly a vanity label, which would make it easy, but there are a few releases of notable artists who are independent of Fish. However, a search for reliable sources produced nothing at all. It would be nice if information could be retained in the Fish article somehow, because it is useful and non-controversial. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:25, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – As an addition to the nomination, I would prefer deletion and then redirection for this article, after an initial deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 18:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Fish (singer) as an alternative to deletion. Agreed that there are significant notability concerns here that make the article not worth keeping on its own. That being said, I would like to hear from Northamerica1000 why he would prefer to delete before redirection; I can't say at this point that I agree with that part unless I know why. Red Phoenix ^talk 03:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.