Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diarmuid Griffin (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diarmuid Griffin[edit]

Diarmuid Griffin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is an Australian rules football biography but he doesn't meet the subject specific notability criteria at WP:NAFL and nor does he have significant coverage in independent reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. He also played a bit of Gaelic football but as far as I can tell not to a level that would pass WP:NGAELIC.

This article was previously at AfD in 2012 where there was no consensus. Jenks24 (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Doesn't meet SSG or GNG. Flickerd (talk) 12:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:29, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.