Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Falzone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 07:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Falzone[edit]

Diana Falzone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Continuous beating back of this article from its blatantly promotional origins is systematically depriving it of any sources. A minor personage given space at a few major media outlets, but as far as sourcing is concerned the fact that she blogs for Fox etc. is about all I can find any sourcing for, except for some National Enquirer-grade celebrity coverage. It's perhaps possible that she might barely pass some notability standard but essnetially none of what's in the article can be reliably sourced beyond the bare fact of her employment. Mangoe (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Seems to be sourced only by facebook and youtube and article shows no evidence of notability.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 18:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 20:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 20:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unless someone should come up with reliable coverage, ideally dead-tree. Nyttend (talk) 16:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.