Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Bianchi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Bianchi[edit]

Not notable. The information can already be found on Christie Brinkley's page, in fact it's the only page that links to it. Besides having the affair with Christie Brinkley's husband she's not notable. I'm listing on AfD because this page has previously been marked with {{db-bio}} but it was reverted/removed. ImmortalGoddezz 14:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Bianchi is a huge story and a young, upcoming sex bombshell with a promising career in singing. Her article should not be deleted over frivolous reasons motivated by jealousy against an aspiring starlet and celebrity home-wrecker.
Delete per nom. Scorpiondollprincess 14:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom Optimale ^Gu 15:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -Big Smooth 16:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Huge news and notable. People will come here looking for information about this person, who is an aspiring professional singer in addition to the Brinkley husband affair. Badagnani 23:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. per Badagnani. — ^`CRAZY`(IN)`SANE^` 03:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. per Badagnani. Likely there is a record deal in her future. Lowellt 03:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just another mistress. References to record deals are crystal-ballisms. -- GWO
Delete per Gareth Owen. Puh-lease. Let her shoot the boyfriend and go to prison if she wants an article. ;-) --Dhartung | Talk 07:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Massmato 16:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but delete the non relevant information, that is everything after the first paragraph. The article shouldn't contain information on Brinkley other than Diana Bianchi was involved in an affair. eventine 13:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I came to the original article while specifically looking for an article on Bianchi. If I'm looking for it, like many other people, should I not be able to find it? Hebron 23:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The world is full of aspiring this-and-thats. Trudy

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.