Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamanté

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Diamante. (non-admin closure) clpo13_(talk) 20:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Diamanté

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonremarkable brand name for a diamond substitute, no refs found Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I created the page as a redirect to Rhinestone to resolve redlinks. Reverting to that first version is a possibility, though some sources define diamanté/diamante as a more generic term including similar objects which are not rhinestones. A redirect to disambiguation Diamante is another option. I think the word should take readers somewhere, but I've no strong feelings as to where. Certes (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Diamante. There's no evidence of this on US trademark search, and at least one of the other topics listed on the disambiguation page (diamante poem) can be "diamanté". Peter James (talk) 21:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect obviously as this is not set for a full separately notable yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or Delete - As per Peter James, or delete for lacking information that doesn't meet the criteria of WP:GNG. Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 23:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.