Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhoop Chhaon (2022 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dhoop Chhaon (2022 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was created by user with a name that suggests COI, or PR firm.

There are no legitimate full reviews of this film. Reviews/sources used in the article are press releases, and possible paid articles.

This business standard has a disclaimer at the bottom This story is provided by PNN. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of this article. (ANI/PNN) (This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

The times of India article was also written by PNN. They did not provide any other disclaimer, but TOI should not be used to establish notability per WP:TOI, and other discussions.

Lokmat Times article also has disclaimer.

The NDTV article is more of a general coverage than a "full length review". This one gives me doubt of paid article.

The article creator also re-created the Ashish Dixit, that article has a socking history. It is likely this film article was created to give some wight to Dixit's article.

In any case, this film does not pass notability guidelines for films as there are no full length reviews, and it also fails general notability guidelines because of lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. —usernamekiran (talk) 17:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. —usernamekiran (talk) 17:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:SALT. We have never been a free web host, but in 2023, everyone knows this. Such an egregious use of our private charity has to be singled out. Bearian (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, deletion contested on the article talk page so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt please, nothing reliable found about the film, what's above for sourcing isn't useful. Oaktree b (talk) 16:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.