Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhad (Buldhana Village)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dhad (Buldhana Village)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No, citation remove : No meet Wikipedia:GNG Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, India, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

speedy keep a legally recognised census town/village per this official source, I added it to the article (on mobile so can't search in census PDF file). This news also confirms the existence of town. Passes WP:GEOLAND. I got these results easily on first search on mobile. I recommend nominator to perform WP:BEFORE, before nominating an article :-) —usernamekiran (talk) 19:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS: article needs a little work, and needs to be renamed after AfD. I will do that once the AfD is closed. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Terrible article but meets WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:30, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.