Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dgheim Number

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:05, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dgheim Number

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a literal definition of "original research", seeing as how the page creator is one of the principal authors on every article used to source this thing (the Renksizbulut paper doesn't mention the subject as far as I can tell). A previous version of the page was nominated for deletion on much the same grounds, but G7'd shortly afterwards. Primefac (talk) 14:42, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 16:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the article history shows copyvios and bouncing back and to from draft space. The article itself is at the level of an undergraduate physics text and not encyclopedic. All but one of the refs are primary and the other probably is too but is unsearchable. Recently created by an spa. Szzuk (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as junk science. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - I don't find independent coverage to support a NPOV version of an article on this topic/neologism, on top of what is discussed above. Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The lead of the article claims that this number is the product of itself and either of two other numbers, implying that both the Prandtl number and the Schmidt number must always equal one, which is obvious nonsense. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:03, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.