Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dewal Pratiharas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dewal Pratiharas[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is not a single reliable source that backed the context that Dewal Pratihar is a clan/tribe or subgroup of any Rajput community. So this article clearly meet the criteria for deletion that is clearly based on Fringe theories and general research that lack of the general notability and even before article was entirely based on poorly unreliable sources that failed the WP:V and even there is not a single quotes provided for the verification. Fancy vißes (call) 01:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the previous comment, and besides the content and lack of references, the poor grammar is an embarrassment to Wikipedia as well. Ira Leviton (talk) 11:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, according to the nomination, I couldn't locate any academic or reliable sources or independent sites that could back up the topic, and it failed both Notability and verifiability.

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, History, and India. Fancy vißes (call) 01:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not notable and cannot locate one reliable source related to this article. HarukaAmaranth ^春 _香 20:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.