Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 20:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. The person is not elected representative, representing government at any level and sources are also scarce. Admantine123 (talk) 19:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Admantine123 (talk) 19:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The Allahabad High Court is an WP:NPOL qualifying position: specifically, judges who have held... state/province–wide office. They're a judge on the highest court of a state with 241 million inhabitants, this is an easy keep. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per TulsaPoliticsFan.Judge of the Allahabad High Court is a WP:NPOL qualifying position.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes NJUDGE. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 12:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per others above, a clear-cut WP:NPOL pass. Sal2100 (talk) 15:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.