Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development and Communication Morphosis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nobody has expressed an interest in keeping the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Development and Communication Morphosis[edit]

Development and Communication Morphosis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable book which fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. The page was created by the author himself, who has since been blocked as a Sockpuppet. Was deleted earlier as WP:G11. Jupitus Smart 15:52, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:11, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just because media did not get this book covered does not mean this book is non notable. Google books shows this book. Also, National Institute of Mass Communication & Journalism, Ahmedabad ( Recognized by Gujarat University ) has this book in their Library. see link: http://nimcj.org/library/View_bookdetail.php?book_id=Development%20and%20Communication%20morphosis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.234.41.150 (talk) 03:38, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quack, Quack. Jupitus Smart 09:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for all the anatine reasons mentioned in the nomination.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.