Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desmond Darby

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Desmond Darby[edit]

Desmond Darby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Is lead author on a few reasonably cited works but does not seem to have a significant impact. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Not a notable politician, didn't win a major election. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:26, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. fails WP:Prof#C1 with h-index of around 10. Not much else. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:34, 7 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete no evidence of real notability. No in depth coverage in independent sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.