Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desmond's Big Day Out

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Smiling Friends. ✗plicit 11:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Desmond's Big Day Out

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot see in any way how this episode is notable. Bubbleblabber.com is an unreliable source (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Blood, Old Souls) and the Collider review could probably easily fit into the main Smiling Friends article. I'd suggest a redirect to the main series article. wizzito | say hello! 08:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Comics and animation. wizzito | say hello! 08:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Smiling Friends - The plot summary is identical to the summary of the episode that already exists at the main page. The reception section consists of one non-reliable source, and one article that discusses the entirety of the first season as a whole that, while probably being an OK source to use on the main series page, does not demonstrate any particular notability for this episode specifically that would justify splitting it out into its own article. Searching for additional sources brings up similar articles - mentions of it in articles that talk about the entirety of the series, but nothing in-depth about it, specifically, that would suggest that a split is warranted. Rorshacma (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - even the page creator knew this was unlikely to be notable, if this edit summary is any indication. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.