Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design Canada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination has been withdrawn by nominator, Cwmhiraeth. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 13:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Design Canada[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this film does not meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. The references include two interviews with the director but I cannot find substantial coverage of the film by reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:27, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - The copyright violations have been removed and the extra citations demonstrate notability. I must admit that when I nominated the article for AfD, I was annoyed by the creator having removed my speedy deletion tag. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I should have mentioned that I nominated this article for speedy deletion under G11 and G12 but the creator of the article, Werldwayd, removed the speedy deletion notice against policy. To his credit he has removed the copyright infringement, improved the article and added more sources, but when he votes keep, he is not a disinterested party. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The coverage in The Globe and Mail is acceptable. It is more a review than an interview, and there is enough non-interview text to count for notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- As well, the Wired article is more than an interview. I think that it is also an independent and useful source that counts for notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:03, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Now there are references giving substantial coverage of the film from WIRED, The Globe and Mail, The National Post, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (English), Radio-Canada (French). There are also lengthy articles in addition, in Azure, Straight, Design Week, Point of View, The GATE and others for this very notable and greatly covered documentary film. werldwayd (talk) 15:49, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY as the article now has references to significant coverage in reliable sources so passes GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 20:56, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.