Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desert Springs Hospital (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Desert Springs Hospital[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Private hospital with no evidence of any notability. Apparently a few celebreties have been treated there but this appears to be either hearsay or information released contrary to medical ethics. Very highly advertorial in style. No refs speak to notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 01:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since the previous AfD a reference to an independent reliable source with national readership was added. The hospital does get some coverage in print: brief mention lockdown new cardiac program purchase by UHS Gab4gab (talk) 18:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete advertisement for the hospital. Jytdog (talk) 04:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No compliance with WP:Before. Fair number of articles on High Beam. Notable enough per WP:GNG. Treating celebrities is part of what they do. The statement "hearsay or information released contrary to medical ethics" is an irrelevant unsupported Ad hominem attack, and near libelous. Content and style is restrained, not Wikipedia:Advertising. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 03:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When I say "advertisement for hospital" I meant that it was (before i cleaned it up, in this version) almost entirely sourced from the hospital's website and of course a third of the content was "Awards and Accolades", of course sourced only from the organization's website. Per WP:PROMO Wikipedia article's are not meant to just be proxies for an organization's website. Jytdog (talk) 03:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ORG. 2 of the sources confirm celebrities were treated there. the other sources merely confirm the hospital exists. LibStar (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.