Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Descending solid coalitions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Descending solid coalitions[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The term "descending solid coalitions" is apparently missing in both Google Books and Google scholar, which is highly irregular for a valid scientific term. The article refers to a single source that is also missing the term. PROD was reverted. The alternate name, "Descending Acquiescing Coalitions", apparently has no independent WP:SIGCOV, see discussion at Talk:Descending solid coalitions#Proposed deletion. Викидим (talk) 07:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As I noted, additional sources use many closely-related terms, like "Solid coalitions", "Proportionality for Solid Coalitions", etc. The article is useful in general discussions of voting systems because it has a fairly unique set of properties like later-no-harm and participation, which makes it useful pedagogically (in articles discussing these criteria). –Sincerely, A Lime 21:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Have to agree with the reasons given here. I also cannot find any notable mentions except for some niche forums of this method, so deletions seems like the right step.

Jannikp97 (talk) 19:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This pretty clearly fails WP:GNG. There's some discussion of it on web forums, but it doesn't appear to have garnered any sort of significant attention in reliable sources at this point. SportingFlyer T·C 23:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.