Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derick Martin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Derick Martin[edit]

Derick Martin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yashovardhan (talk) 09:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting a final time to hopefully generate any discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Doesn't appear to meet WP:NHOCKEY: hasn't played in a top level league (which I assume would mean the NHL) or received high level honours in a second-level league (AHL). He has got a little press[1][2] in his home town of Timmins (pop. 41,788) but nothing to meet WP:GNG. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: my searches seem to agree with the above, only finding local routine coverage and nothing more of significance for GNG. Falls short of NHOCKEY in all regards. Yosemiter (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.