Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Lebrero
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 03:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Derek Lebrero[edit]
- Derek Lebrero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- WP:VANITY - Created by sockpuppet of paid editor. Assumed to be WP:PAID
- WP:GNG lacking sources from WP:RS. Other sources are web sources featuring: IMDb, Dork Shelf and two of the other websites appear to be the same site but with different logos: bestshorts.net theindiefest.com
Original PROD, which was seconded, was removed by a SPA... Thus I am bringing to AfD PeterWesco (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - with extreme prejudice. NickCT (talk) 20:58, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ...please. Λuα (Operibus anteire) 22:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing there except claims to notability by association, and even that is weak at best. Fails WP:ENT, not to mention basic notability. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as Original Research and spammy--Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.