Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deputy collector

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deputy collector[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This may be a notable topic, but as the article stands it is just too poorly sourced and written (and has been for some time now). Best to delete this and start all over again. QueenofBithynia (talk) 21:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is not enough significant coverage from reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Pleases ping me if you found new RS. Nasin3030 (talk) 13:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It is a second highest post in Indian Administrative Service so it is notable but it have to be delete and start again with best sources. It is very important post in a district you can see this https://northgoa.gov.in/whos-who/ https://ganjam.nic.in/about-district/whos-who/ https://ganjam.nic.in/about-district/whos-who/ Contributor008 (talk) 12:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.