Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depreciation of goodwill/dilution in trademark law
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Trademark dilution. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Depreciation of goodwill/dilution in trademark law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be duplicate to Trademark dilution, though I am not an expert. Since the article appears mostly to address the concept in Canadian law a merge may be in order, but I'm listing at AfD to get more input on this. Prodego talk 22:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I prodded this article earlier today, and the reasoning still stands "Essay and how-to" in addition to the evidence brought up by Prodego. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 22:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge there is sourced content worth keeping --Guerillero | My Talk 22:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge though the content that is sourced is mainly primary sources, and WP:SYNTH is on the lurk, it could provide valuable material for the other article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Trademark dilution, which is the nom's second choice. If nobody can do it, then a redirect will save the history. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.