Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deposit-taking co-operative

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Owen× 13:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deposit-taking co-operative (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a small phenomenon that got a bit of coverage in Malaysia in late 80s. [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 20:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Turns out there is a ton of coveraqe available, even in English [2]. The article didn't make it clear, but the collapse of these institutions led to a major financial and political crisis in Malaysia in the 1980s. We can't dismiss the subject as unimportant just because it's about Malaysia; that would be a form of WP:Systemic bias. And we can't dismiss it because most of the notability was in the 1980s; that would be WP:Recentism. I have added sources to the article and clarified it, so please take another look. --MelanieN (talk) 01:58, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. It looks to me as if the author of the article has not been notified about this AfD. Nominator, would you like to do that or should I? --MelanieN (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.