Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deon Hampton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 01:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deon Hampton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly uncited, article has existed in a poor condition for two years. Looks like a reporter, local with little independent notability. Off2riorob (talk) 19:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 19:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 06:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - perhaps local reporter. But the sources indicates to me atleast that a minimum of notability needed for inclusion has been reached.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

could you explain which notability criterion is being met? LibStar (talk) 13:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

note to closing admin according to this user's log, this is the part of 5 keep !votes undertaken in 5 minutes. LibStar (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete clearly does not meet any criterion of WP:CREATIVE. there is a namesake accused of murder, but the only coverage is of Deon writing articles locally not about Deon as the subject of coverage. [1]. LibStar (talk) 13:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.