Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dentacoin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dentacoin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability per WP:GNG. The only sources I can find are self-published, promotional postings and a blog that seems to be promotional as well. ... discospinster _talk 17:33, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG at the moment. I can find no significant mentions of the subject outside of press releases or article written by affiliated parties. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete entirely promotional as a topic. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Promotional, yes. Likely to succeed, no. But that's a value judgement. Keep the article for six months. See if it gets more than two customers. If not, delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhadow (talk • contribs) 15:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: @Rhadow: two customers?! If that was the criteria for inclusion for companies Wikipedia would have at least a million more articles. DrStrauss talk 08:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Articles should be judged on their credibility now and not whether they could be an article next year. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.