Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DennyB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

DennyB

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

DennyB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reference bombed with unreliable sources (except for tooXclusive which has no in-depth coverage). Subject fails the general notability guidelines and any other SNG. Also, note that, the image in the entry was uploaded on Commons just a day after the creation of this article. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Reading Beans (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing found for this fellow. Not charted, no awards, not even streaming numbers to justify some sort of notability. Oaktree b (talk) 20:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep Talking about notability this user has a Celebrity knowledge panel that is autogenerated or created by Google for notable musicians that has notable mentions everywhere on the internet as seen here. My colleague above was talking about numbers with my investigations I found out that the subject has over 30,973 monthly listeners are enough reasons to be considered notable as seen here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalageohio (talk • contribs) 07:07, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

• Digitalageohio is the creator of the contested article. -The Gnome (talk) 13:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete: Does not meet MUSICBIO Princess of Ara 11:51, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep subject is featured on Resident Advisor artist platform which can not be paid for and resident advisor is a reliable source for Wikipedia citations plus subject is also featured on TooXclusive with over 30,000 Spotify monthly listeners user fit the notability status plus with my investigations, I found out that subject had copyright issues and lost some of his newspapers features. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitalageohio (talk • contribs) 13:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Striking multiple participations in AfD. -The Gnome (talk) 13:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete His being featured in Resident Advisor is not enough to make the case for notability. Most of the article's sources are primary, or otherwise give very little about Abuchi outside of a soapbox of his music. GuardianH (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep with over 30,000 Spotify monthly listeners I feel that he meets the criteria for notability and since I saw that he lost some of his press releases due to some copyright issues the article should be considered a stub.Digitalageohio (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

• @Digitalageohio You've voted three times in an attempt to keep this article. You shouldn't keep labeling the replies Keep and instead respond with a Reply to avoid any further confusion. GuardianH (talk) 21:41, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
• Striking multiple participations in AfD. -The Gnome (talk) 13:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

• Delete since subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NCREATIVE. -The Gnome (talk) 13:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.