Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Yan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus following relisting. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Yan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 03:08, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Another substub hockey article, and I'm almost at the point of writing WP:DOLOVISCREATEDIT into WP:COMMONOUTCOMES. Somewhat brazenly (and neither for the first or the fiftieth time), he set forth that the "honors" qualifying this NN amateur player with no distinction for an article was participating in the Hlinka tournament and in junior amateur championships, despite all-but-unanimous and ongoing consensus that such explicitly didn't meet the requirements of NHOCKEY. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence that the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 08:56, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't agree that this article, at over 200 words with multiple references is a "substub" or even close to one. But the references present do not add up to notability, and the accomplishments do not meet WP:NHOCKEY. Rlendog (talk) 01:36, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now until there's a better article for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.