Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Grabosch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 03:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dennis Grabosch[edit]
- Dennis Grabosch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A. short and unlikely to be expanded. I've copied some info to the main page (Alles was zählt), omit. episode-specific. Skarebo (talk) 05:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I can't speak german, which most the coverage of him is in but but I did find at least one exclusive article on him ([1]) and both the German and Polish language Wikipedia's have an article on him and I hear that the German Wikipedia has strict Notability criterion. Also, the German Wikipedia article has a not insignificant list of roles in what appear to be notable productions. Icewedge (talk) 06:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Makes sense. The problem with an article's current state is that it's centered not on the actor, but only on one of the characters he played – the notability of the actor is unclear and the subject is confusing… Skarebo (talk) 06:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. The nominator hasn't presented any valid reason for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.