Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deniz Khazaniuk (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as WP:TOOSOON. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 01:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deniz Khazaniuk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This nomination is essentially not different from the previous deletion discussion two years ago; Deniz Khazaniuk is not notable by project standards; she has no Fed Cup or WTA main draw appearances, has not won any ITF tournaments above the $25,000 category, had no remarkable junior career (neither a Grand Slam champion nor ranked within the world's top 3), and there are no further claims that she is otherwise, at present, generally notable. I have no idea why this was re-created just a few days ago. Jared Preston (talk) 18:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:GNG for consistent coverage over her career. [1], [2], [3], [4]. It looks like there was some kind of drama surrounding her that led to one of her rivals refusing to shake her hand after the match.[5] Probably recreated recently because she won some money in Moscow in June, defeated Anastasia Pivovarova. [6], [7]. Nominator is reminded to look for native-language sources WP:BEFORE nominating for AfD. —Мандичка^YO 😜 22:35, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural delete The same editor, דעאל123, created both the 2013 and 2015 versions of this article. If an article is deleted and the subject subsequently becomes notable, an editor is supposed to bring the matter to WP:Deletion review, not write a new article. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fairly silly. It was deleted two years ago and obviously is not the same version of the page. Where does it say that is a requirement? I see deletion review may be used for that purpose, but no requirement that it must be. If this was really a requirement, it should be impossible to recreate articles that had been previously deleted (like salted articles are impossible to recreate). —Мандичка^YO 😜 03:22, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Does not meet tennis project notability guidelines and the limited coverage shown does not seem to me to be sufficient to claim WP:GNG.--Wolbo (talk) 17:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under G4, still fails WP:NTENNIS, coverage is WP:ROUTINE ("...routine news coverage of such things as announcements, sports, and tabloid journalism are not sufficient basis for an article." [my bolding]), fails WP:GNG Kraxler (talk) 17:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails the notability guidelines for tennis players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.