Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Smyth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Denis Smyth[edit]
- Denis Smyth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- Denis smyth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The subject of the article is not notable. Not a single third party mention can be found using a search engine. Besides, the results mention many Denis Smyths, which have nothing to do with this professor.--Kylohk 13:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as WP:CSD#A7, seeing as no third party mentions are found. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 16:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as unremarkable people.Keep per DGG's sources, now seems notable. Carlosguitar 22:43, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Delete, unless sources can be find verifying that this person is real. Lankiveil 01:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment, to clarify, he probably is a professor, and he seems to have actually been involved in writing some of the articles and things that the article claims. I'm still not sure that this chap passes WP:PROF, although the fact that his is a relatively common name makes verifying that difficult. Lankiveil 02:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment I was just about to make the point about his having a common name. However, Google searches using his publications, such as this search on one of his publications brings up one of his works being used as a reference by the US National Archives here.Flowerpotman talk|contribs 02:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, to clarify, he probably is a professor, and he seems to have actually been involved in writing some of the articles and things that the article claims. I'm still not sure that this chap passes WP:PROF, although the fact that his is a relatively common name makes verifying that difficult. Lankiveil 02:21, 20 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- Strong Keep Real is very easy--you just find the Dept of History at the University of Toronto on the web and check their faculty list, & link to his bio. He is full professor of history at probably the most important Canadian research university. Therefore he must have published something. From WorldCat and Historical Abstracts, I found the references; they include editing of a truly monumental collection of post-World War two British documents. Anyone can check WorldCat. DGG 02:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per DGG and my comment above. Flowerpotman talk|contribs 02:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.