Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demos Direct Initiative Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Demos Direct Initiative Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources. Political party founded two months ago with no elected candidates fails NPOL. May be a case of TOOSOON. DarjeelingTea (talk) 15:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Possible WP:TOOSOON. They seem like a fledgling party who have potential to become notable, but for now I'd say they are not. bojo | talk 15:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unable to find any sources at all. AusLondonder (talk) 20:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The closest I found to coverage was an internet radio show. They're a very minor spin-off of Ukip in Poole, and though they're registered this isn't enough to show notability. Fences&Windows 14:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 21:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON and dearth of adequate sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In the interests of fair coverage, a political orgaisation with historical links within a major party could meet notability guidelines. The hasty deletion of content leads to a lack of broad information on subjects, especially within the political field, which is uniquely complex in it's nature. Demos is notable for inclusion as it is a registered political party, and arguably more prominent than many of the minuscule inclusions that have been accepted, establishing precedent. Multiple, clear sources have been provided. Vintage Macau (talk) 01:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, as a matter of fact, zero independent, reliable, secondary sources have been provided. Per WP:ORGSIG no company or organisations is inherently notable and per WP:INHERITORG an organisation is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. AusLondonder (talk) 02:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.