Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic nominees for governor of California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic nominees for governor of California[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:LISTN, cites no sources (all citations are actually just notes), no sourcing on the group as a whole (as in, all the Democratic nominees). I think it would be best to redirect them to Governor of California, much like how Republican nominee for Lieutenant Governor of Kentucky redirects to Lieutenant Governor of Kentucky.

I think the same could be said for List of Democratic nominees for Governor of Illinois, List of Democratic nominees for Governor of Kentucky, and List of Republican nominees for Governor of Kentucky. reppop^talk 03:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Lists of people. reppop^talk 03:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not appropriate for a standalone list, especially since parties currently do not nominate candidates in California elections. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, literally nothing more than an inaccessible list, which means it could be a category, and in fact I'm sure already is. --Golbez (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject fails WP:LISTN as a stand alone list and serves to illustrate WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Shawn Teller (talk) 01:41, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.