Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DemList

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DemList

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Majority of references are primary or mentions. Considered (I am not a Yank) that there are no reliable sources for this article. Does not meet WP:NMEDIA; does not meet WP:WEBPAGE. Whiteguru (talk) 11:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whiteguru and all, I have edited the page to remove any sentences which seemed to promote the organization or used non-encyclopedic language. Hopefully this properly addresses the "contains content that is written like an advertisement". I am currently in the process of searching for new sources which will better adhere to Wiki's policies, as I am aware that the page contains too many primary sources in its current form. I would like to replace these with good quality secondary sources, but want to make sure that they are better than mentions. Could you elaborate on the sources that you feel only qualify as "mentions", as I tried to choose external sources that include at least several paragraphs on the organization. I plan to continue editing and I would encourage others to do the same (including adding better sourcing), so I suggest we KEEP for the time being. Dwolfor3 (talk) 15:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Regarding the message from the article's author (Dwolfor3) above, please be advised that notability is a separate concern to promotional writing. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete References fail to establish notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just no notability to be found.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.