Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deluxe Triple Crown Champion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 05:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deluxe Triple Crown Champion[edit]

Delete, unencyclopedic and non-notable. From the previous db-reason:

Fabrication. A google search for "Deluxe Triple Crown" returns 35 results, with several of them mirrors of this page. There are no sources, further indicating that this is a creation of the original editor only.

This is true. I got 43 hits, but that doesn't change anything. The first result - a blog entry written by the article's creator - essentially confirms that this is something he made up. --Aurochs (Talk | Block)

Delete as per non DrIdiot 23:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP not a crystal ball, the article admits no one has won this yet. Ruby 03:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fiction. McPhail 08:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WWE does not themselves use this distinction, and it is unlikely that anyone will have that distinction in the near future. It's really for the wrestling statistician/historian types. kelvSYC 20:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. --Toffile 01:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per kelvSYC. --Oakster 21:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.