Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Security
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 23:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delta Security (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable security company. BradV 18:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The fact that a business exists does not establish notability.--Richhoncho (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No information on the comapny other than their web page. Even given the claim that Delta is the first company in the UK to achieve Security Industry Authority (SIA) Approved Contractor Status in Close Protection, Door Supervision and Security Guarding. There is no verifiable source to check this with. And to be honest, I can not believe they were the first or only company to achieve. ShoesssS Talk 19:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The company's choice of name makes it difficult to find references to it on Google News because a search turns up lots of references to Delta Air Lines security staff, security in the Niger Delta and Camp Delta. I didn't find anything helpful at a variety of United Kingdom news sites such as telegraph.co.uk, guardian.co.uk, timesonline.co.uk and bbc.co.uk Something might be found in a UK security trade magazine. --Eastmain (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:COMPANY. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable and non-verifiable. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.