Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dell Latitude

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP (8 keep, 1 delete, 2 merge/redirect). Rob e rt 00:41, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dell Latitude[edit]

Delete--Dell's products are non-notable and will not be significant 100 years from now Fsdfs 22:56, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect all to Dell and protect against recreation. BD2412 ^talk 23:43, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Keep as notable model of computer. Capitalistroadster 00:01, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep major brand, is notable version Matthewvelie 00:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Samboy 00:25, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect all to Dell. It's not that I think the model itself is non-notable; I just think it would make more sense to list all o fthe models together, in one place, for comparison's sake. --Jacquelyn Marie 04:14, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Dell's products are notable.--Nicodemus75 04:26, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dell product lines. We have a ton of articles about Apple product lines, what's the difference? Rhobite 13:55, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Dell's product lines are notable, although specific products (ie. Dimension 8300) are not. There's way too much information to include this all in Dell. Carbonite | Talk 14:02, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It doesn't matter whether they will be relevant 100 years from now. They are now. CalJW 19:08, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, bad-faith nomination with an agenda. This user is promoting Alienware brand computers (Alienware Area 51 [1] and created Alienware Bot), even nominating Area 51 for a page move request, while simultaneously nominating various Dell brand pages for deletion (this AfD and quite a number of others). -- Curps 19:40, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.